Mishná
Mishná

Talmud sobre Baba Batra 4:2

לֹא אֶת הַבּוֹר, וְלֹא אֶת הַדּוּת, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁכָּתַב לוֹ עֻמְקָא וְרוּמָא. וְצָרִיךְ לִקַּח לוֹ דֶרֶךְ, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לִקַּח לוֹ דָרֶךְ. וּמוֹדֶה רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא, בִּזְמַן שֶׁאָמַר לוֹ חוּץ מֵאֵלּוּ, שֶׁאֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לִקַּח לוֹ דָרֶךְ. מְכָרָן לְאַחֵר, רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר, אֵינוֹ צָרִיך לִקַּח לוֹ דֶרֶךְ. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, צָרִיךְ לִקַּח לוֹ דָרֶךְ:

(Él no) (vendió) el bor [una cavidad en el suelo] ni la duth [una estructura de piedras sobre el suelo en forma de bor], incluso si le escribió (que lo está vendiendo) la profundidad y La altura (de la casa). [No adquiere el bor y el duth ya que su uso (almacenamiento de agua) es distinto del (de) la casa. (No se adquieren) a menos que él escriba "desde el fondo de las profundidades hasta las alturas de los cielos"]. Y él [el vendedor] debe comprar los derechos de acceso [del comprador al bor y al duth. Porque el vendedor vende "generosamente", sin reservarse nada para sí mismo.] Estas son las palabras de R. Akiva. Los sabios dicen: No necesita comprar derechos de acceso. [Sostienen que el vendedor vende "sin límites", de modo que cuando vendió la casa, se reservó para sí los derechos de acceso al bor y al duth.] Y R. Akiva reconoce que si le dice: "Excepto estos" [ el bor y el duth], no necesita comprar derechos de acceso, [porque, como es una condición superflua, se entiende que se refiere a los derechos de acceso.] Si los vendió [el bor y el duth] a otro, [saliendo de la casa para sí mismo], R. Akiva dice que él (el comprador) no necesita comprar derechos de acceso, [para el vendedor vende "generosamente", y cuando le vendió el bor y el duth, también vendió derechos de acceso.] Los sabios dicen que debe comprar los derechos de acceso. [La halajá está de acuerdo con R. Akiva.]

Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot

111In a slightly different formulation, this paragraph is also in Baba batra 4:2. Rebbi Jeremiah said, both Admon and Rebbi Aqiba said the same thing, as we have stated there112Mishnah Baba batra 4:2. The Mishnah belongs to a series of statements about commercial contracts. If somebody sold cisterns in his backyard to a third party, R. Aqiba holds that nobody buys anything which he cannot use; therefore, it is understood that the seller, by offering the cisterns for sale, did also offer access to them. But the Sages hold that people also buy real estate for speculation and, therefore, the sale covers only what is explicitly stated in the sales contract and nothing more.: “If he sold them to another person, Rebbi Aqiba said, he does not have to buy access, but the Sages say, he has to buy access.” He had not heard that Rebbi Hila said, Rebbi Yasa in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan: They disagree when nothing was mentioned113The sales contract does not mention access.. Where do we hold? If it is obvious that access was included114If the right of access to the property was mentioned in the contract., everybody agrees that he does not have to pay for access. If it is obvious that access was not included115It is not necessary that access was excluded, it suffices if the contract states that only cisterns are sold., everybody agrees that he has to pay for access. But we must hold that nothing was mentioned. Then Rebbi Aqiba said, he does not have to buy access, but the rabbis say, he has to buy access. But in the case here, even while it is clear that he had access, everybody116This is not everybody; everybody except Admon. The question in Ketubot is not one of interpretation of commercial contracts but of enforcing a claim if it is not known against whom the claim could be enforced. agrees that he has to pay for access.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versículo anteriorCapítulo completoVersículo siguiente